Implementing
The practice of implementing tools for specific learners
|
This section of my ePortfolio focuses on the practice of user-based design and implementation.
When I began to design my ePortfolio, I struggled with the idea of Implementing as its own category. However, after some consideration, I concluded that while there is a lot of overlap between Designing, Implementing, and Analyzing, that Implementing did deserve its own place. That is why I used a Venn diagram for the basis of my portfolio; ideas have their own space, but they also share space with other ideas. While there is great joy and excitement in designing a new idea, the difficulty and skill comes to play in executing and implementing the idea. So implementing does involve design, but the practice of implementation specifically looks at the end user and carefully adjusts and caters the design to be successful for the learner that will be using the design, tool, or learning technique. Artifacts include:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
ImplementingThe practice of implementing tools and strategies for specific users is an important skill of educational technologists. And being mindful of users is an important part of the PCK of TPCK as "PCK is concerned with the representation and formulation of concepts, pedagogical techniques, knowledge of what makes concepts difficult or easy to learn, knowledge of students' prior knowledge, and theories of epistemology" (Mishra & Koehler, 2006, p. 1027). Click here for Page References
Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42. Cox, K., Franklin, M., Hagen, S., Handford, A., & Mauro, S. (2017). ETEC 500: Research Methodology in Education, research proposal assignment submission [Written PDF document]. Glasersfeld, E. Von. (2005). Introduction: Aspects of constructivism. Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers’ College Press, 21-25. Glasersfeld, E. Von. (2008). Learning as a Constructive Activity. AntiMatters, 2(3), 33-49. Handford, A. (2017). ETEC 530: Constructivist Strategies for E-Learning, assignment 1 submission [Written PDF document]. John-Steiner, V. & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework, Educational Psychologist, 31, 191-206. Kraemer, E. W., Lombardo, S. V., & Lepkowski, F. J. (2007). The librarian, the machine, or a little of both: A comparative study of three information literacy pedagogies at Oakland University. College & Research Libraries, 68(4), 330-342. Orey, M. (2002). Information Processing. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Pritchard, D. (2014). What is this thing called knowledge?. Routledge. Wang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: Using a complex adaptive systems framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,18(2), 380-393. Categories
All
Archives |
RSS Feed
